Mark Minasi's Reader Forum
Mark Minasi's Reader Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Search | FAQ | Minasi Forum RSS Feed
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Off Topic
 Off Topic Banter
 What narks you about Windows?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

mitachu
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

United Kingdom
1775 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  03:42:23 AM  Show Profile  Click to see mitachu's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
What's that little thing that annoys you most about Windows?

OK, there may be more than just the one ;)

Mine is the fact that an unreadable CD can bring Explorer to its knees. Or browsing Network Neighbourhood and having Explorer crash out because something's not responding in time.

Tim

Playwell
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

Netherlands
4112 Posts
Status: online

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  03:48:52 AM  Show Profile  Visit Playwell's Homepage  Click to see Playwell's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
The fact that you need so many tools to manage it

'People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. '

Quote by Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

joe_elway
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

Ireland
6733 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  06:54:20 AM  Show Profile  Visit joe_elway's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by mitachu


Mine is the fact that an unreadable CD can bring Explorer to its knees. Or browsing Network Neighbourhood and having Explorer crash out because something's not responding in time.



Oh yeah. Those are deffo annoying. I wouldn't argue with either one of those being #1 on the list.

"Stinky keys". I'm at a machine I don't use very often, am in the middle of typing and I hold down <shift> for too long. Beeeedeeedeeedeeeedeeep.

The ever changing GUI and names for things. The renaming department in MS must be laid to waste.

Aidan Finn
MCSE, MVP (Virtual Machine: Systems Administration)

IT Blog: http://www.aidanfinn.com
My Photography: http://www.aidanfinnphoto.com/
My Hyper-V Book: Mastering Hyper-V Deployment
Twitter: http://twitter.com/joe_elway
Go to Top of Page

mitachu
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

United Kingdom
1775 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  07:52:29 AM  Show Profile  Click to see mitachu's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
I have to say the new Microsoft way of hiding the menu bar (IE7, Windows Defender, Live Messenger...) is downright irritating.

Tim
Go to Top of Page

JSCLMEDAVE
Administrator

USA
4818 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  08:16:37 AM  Show Profile  Visit JSCLMEDAVE's Homepage  Click to see JSCLMEDAVE's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
The SQL team in general. At the moment anyway due to the PowerShell issue.

Edit - Clarification

Tim-

"Will the woman who left her 9 kids at Wrigley field please come and claim them? - they're beating the Cubs 5-0"


Edited by - JSCLMEDAVE on 06/20/2008 10:46:16 AM
Go to Top of Page

wobble_wobble
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

Ireland
3069 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  09:09:52 AM  Show Profile  Visit wobble_wobble's Homepage  Look at the Skype address for wobble_wobble  Reply with Quote
If your in the middle of a few things and the way differernt windows popin/ popout while your typing.

That drives me completely daft.

Joe

After everything that has happened during the month of Jan 07, I do believe that pigs fly backwards!

“If you think competence is expensive,try incompetence.” - From a Training Manual
Go to Top of Page

jaxdave
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

USA
2212 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  09:51:25 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Lack of a stable operating system . For the love of god , Just get one right and stick with it . That we we will not have to completely overhaul every 3-4 years.

I should add that I understand hardware updates etc but we shouldn't have to completely rewrite the OS every time should we?

Edited by - jaxdave on 06/20/2008 09:53:29 AM
Go to Top of Page

arek73
Moderator

Poland
4610 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  10:13:38 AM  Show Profile  Visit arek73's Homepage  Click to see arek73's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
As Joe mentioned, the way Windows handle foreground apps. For goodness sake, if I am alredy typing something in application of my choice, let any other app run in background!

----
Arek
Go to Top of Page

NikolasE
Old Timer

Cyprus
685 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  10:39:51 AM  Show Profile  Click to see NikolasE's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
When Applications Hung (Application is not responding) I just hate it.

The Only Real Benefit from having msn.com and microsoft.com in the forest instead of msn.microsoft.com is how it all looks on a Powershell Presenation .
Go to Top of Page

JSCLMEDAVE
Administrator

USA
4818 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  10:45:07 AM  Show Profile  Visit JSCLMEDAVE's Homepage  Click to see JSCLMEDAVE's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by joe_elway

"Stinky keys". I'm at a machine I don't use very often, am in the middle of typing and I hold down <shift> for too long. Beeeedeeedeeedeeeedeeep.




I work on a lot of virtual PCs from my laptop... That BEEEEPPP!!! ugh...

You can turn off the Beep service in Microsoft Windows XP or in Microsoft Windows Server 2003. To do this, type the following command at a command prompt, and then press ENTER:

sc config beep start= disabled

Note You must include the space after the equal sign (=).

To turn the beep sound back on, type the sc config beep start= command together with one of the following startup types:
boot
system
auto
demand

Tim-

"Will the woman who left her 9 kids at Wrigley field please come and claim them? - they're beating the Cubs 5-0"


Edited by - JSCLMEDAVE on 06/20/2008 10:50:30 AM
Go to Top of Page

runswithsizzors
Seasoned But Casual Onlooker

50 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  11:40:20 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I think mircosoft should look at this post. I see so many things we all agree on. App focus control is the most annoying thing in the world, or even in IE where I open it and start typing the address part then (I know changing my home page would probably solve this msn.com) but then it switches focus to the search box on the web page. The hanging on network searches and CD is as well. The renames in Vista was dumb too, it took me 5 minutes the first time I used Vista to find add and remove programs. Don't do that. These function user interfaces on Office products and what not (yeah that is right FUI). They acronym says it all.
Go to Top of Page

Jake Mueller
Here To Stay

USA
109 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  1:58:38 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
the WMI repository getting hosed up for no reason at all.

<i>Hey, you're not fun, you're fat!</i>
Go to Top of Page

mitachu
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

United Kingdom
1775 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  2:12:05 PM  Show Profile  Click to see mitachu's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
The app focus thing is something that I don't really get much of. I generally use X-Mouse, so if my mouse pointer is in a window, the focus remains on that window. It also has the side effect of allowing me to type into windows at the bottom of the window stack. This is something that reminds me of my pre-Windows, RISC OS days. *dewy eyes*

Tim
Go to Top of Page

arek73
Moderator

Poland
4610 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  2:19:11 PM  Show Profile  Visit arek73's Homepage  Click to see arek73's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
Also, does every new release of OS has to be that BIG and sloppy in performance that it will choke even the fastest computer on the market?

----
Arek
Go to Top of Page

netmarcos
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

USA
1909 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  3:11:05 PM  Show Profile  Visit netmarcos's Homepage  Click to see netmarcos's MSN Messenger address  Look at the Skype address for netmarcos  Send netmarcos a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
I'll bite. Not being able to reinitialize NetBIOS after a name conflict has been detected and corrected without a reboot of the machine. Talk about the ultimate DoS attack. All I have to do is bring some lousy machine online with the same name as some critical server (let's say an Exchange mailbox server) and that production system is effectively dead until it is rebooted. There should be a way to restart this subsystem. Think about it.

Mark M. Webster

Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped. - Elbert Hubbard

Go to Top of Page

Dave Sweatt
Old Timer

USA
402 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  4:15:09 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I've always been annoyed by the fact that their developement teams lay out their apps independantly and without standardization.
Minor case in point, changing default file locations for word is 1 place and can browse to it, and excel and access it's another place and requires typing in the full path. Not a big deal really, I'd just think they'd agree on 1 or the otherand standardize as a company. There's other instances of the same type of behavior, office just came to mind as I just had to help a barely literate user set these up and enjoyed a nice whine from them about it.

Vegetarians eat vegetables.
Humanitarians frighten me.

Edited by - Dave Sweatt on 06/20/2008 4:17:29 PM
Go to Top of Page

Doug G
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

USA
2096 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  7:23:30 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Do a large file copy from the gui over the network, only to have it stop after an hour with some "permission denied" on a file and not being able to continue and skip the file. I don't know how many hours windows has stolen from my life because of this cruddy design.

Some new hardware fails to install, or windows can't find a driver for it, and there is no information in the new hardware found dialog that identifies just what device it is that failed.

No ctrl-c or other way to break out of a hung app (as mentioned above). Just sit and wait, and waste more time.

Steve Ballmer. :) (I don't know him, I just find the corporate direction of MS is less to my liking since he took the reins).

Vista backup.




======
Doug G
======
Go to Top of Page

Borg
Here To Stay

USA
179 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  10:20:22 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
There are no windows on it :(. It lies.
Go to Top of Page

NikolasE
Old Timer

Cyprus
685 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/20/2008 :  11:48:24 PM  Show Profile  Click to see NikolasE's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by JSCLMEDAVE

quote:
Originally posted by joe_elway

"Stinky keys". I'm at a machine I don't use very often, am in the middle of typing and I hold down <shift> for too long. Beeeedeeedeeedeeeedeeep.




I work on a lot of virtual PCs from my laptop... That BEEEEPPP!!! ugh...

You can turn off the Beep service in Microsoft Windows XP or in Microsoft Windows Server 2003. To do this, type the following command at a command prompt, and then press ENTER:

sc config beep start= disabled

Note You must include the space after the equal sign (=).

To turn the beep sound back on, type the sc config beep start= command together with one of the following startup types:
boot
system
auto
demand




I hate it also specially when i have the speakers to listen to songs this beepppppppppppp kills yous. Thanks

The Only Real Benefit from having msn.com and microsoft.com in the forest instead of msn.microsoft.com is how it all looks on a Powershell Presenation .
Go to Top of Page

nike6
Seasoned But Casual Onlooker

Ireland
28 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/21/2008 :  12:15:34 PM  Show Profile  Visit nike6's Homepage  Reply with Quote
what i really liked was...

take hard drive with WIN98SE from PC1 (new AMD x64) to PC2 (old PIII), and it starts up, goes through the board hardware, performs configuration.

then search for USB driver CDs...and got the right one for old multimedia cards (64MB).
can transfer driver package for the (new) graphics card (28 mbyte)!

what i did not like was...

old sound cards (some years)- no drivers for new x64 boards, new Windows. OK just buy a new card (getting a collection of 10 or 20 cards soon).

OK the annoying part is that MS believes people always want to dispose their old PC- there are people who are ready to buy a new PC, new Windows, but they want to keep the old one as well- and have two PCs, and after a while, 3 PCs!
and not everyone wants to hook up all of the PCs in the home to the internet.

you could for instance, use the old PIII system to watch DVDs (if you do not just want to buy a TV set, and a DVD player).

but, and that's the point they do not support, maybe people want two regions, or two different places to see DVDs.
OK it is also possible to buy two new PCs, two new Windows!

people must pay tax for cars (but not for operating system licenses). otherwise, maybe people would keep the old car- even if it is just for the purpose to have it around.

http://www.popfly.com/users/tetsu-jp
Go to Top of Page

JamesNT
Moderator

USA
2526 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/22/2008 :  03:22:44 AM  Show Profile  Click to see JamesNT's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
Everyone,

I feel the need to temper this discussion as what I am seeing here is what appears to be an episode of slashdot. This isn't to say that I don't agree with some of what you all are saying, but I do think we need to peel back a few more layers of the onion before passing judgement so quickly. Bear with me here for a few moments and let's really think about this.

quote:

The fact that you need so many tools to manage it



I agree with this statement. However, when one considers just how much you can do with Windows, I'm not surprised at the plethora of tools available. Other operating systems have the same issues.

quote:

The ever changing GUI and names for things. The renaming department in MS must be laid to waste.



Please see the following blog post:

http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2004/05/25/141253.aspx

I do agree that things being moved around all the time can be confusing. But the afore mentioned blog post has a serious point: How much complaining would there be if Vista looked just like Windows 2000?

quote:

Lack of a stable operating system . For the love of god , Just get one right and stick with it . That we we will not have to completely overhaul every 3-4 years.



Windows handles hundreds of thousands of hardware/software combinations that I would not dare throw at any other OS.

Also, how similar is the landscape now as opposed to 10 years ago? Today, we have USB 2.0 with 3.0 right around the corner. Back then we did not. Today, we have phishing, spam, etc. 10 years ago the worst thing in the woods was a boot sector virus and we laugh at those today.

Yes, things do change. And whether we like it or not, the look and feel must change as well to handle people's perception. As far as stability goes, I hardly ever see a BSOD starting with XP as opposed to the almost every other week routine I had with NT 4.0.

quote:

When Applications Hung (Application is not responding) I just hate it.



How do we know this isn't a problem with the app? Could we be blaming Windows unfairly?

quote:

Also, does every new release of OS has to be that BIG and sloppy in performance that it will choke even the fastest computer on the market?



I remember when NT 4.0 came out. OMG! Windoze needs a full 64MB of RAM to run. I can't believe how INSANCE M$ is! This will be the year of Linux on the desktop!!

Then came Windows 2000. OMG! Windoze requires 256MB of RAM to even halfway run decent. M$ can't write an OS to save their ass! This will surely drive more people to linux!!!

And don't forget XP. OMG! Windoze now needs a WHOPPING 512MB of RAM! When will this madness end?? Linux, save us!!

And finally, Vista. OMFG!! Windoze needs a WHOLE GIG OF RAM JUST TO GET IT'S ASS OUT OF BED IN THE MORNING! I'm going to go shoot myself!!

The reason Windows has become more hardware intensive over the years is because we demand more from the operating system. We demand better graphics, and those graphics are not free. It takes CPU cycles to calculate the transparency and how everything should look in Aero glass. Mark Minasi explains all this on CD 1 of this Vista Audio Seminar. We also demand better cacheing, Hi Def, better sound, search, and all kinds of stuff that require yet more CPU cycles and more memory.

If you want all that performance back, do the same things I did back in 2002 for those who complained about XP when they installed it on their old Windows 2000 computers. Go to Star | Control Panel. Then, click on System and Maintenance and then on System. On the left hand side, click the link that says Advanced System Settings (acknowledge the UAC prompt when you do). Click on Settings under the Performance subsection. Choose the option that says Adjust for Best Performance. As soon as you do that, Windows Vista will revert back pretty much to the Windows 2000 GUI design and you'll get a huge boost in performance. In fact, you'll notice a lot less work by your GPU.

Next, pull up the services.msc tool and scroll down until you find the SUPERFETCH server and turn it off. You'll notice that most of your memory suddenly gets freed up.

By doing those simple things, you can get Vista onto older computers with less hassle. But look at the price you must pay.

quote:

Some new hardware fails to install, or windows can't find a driver for it, and there is no information in the new hardware found dialog that identifies just what device it is that failed.



But is this truly the fault of Windows? Or the hardware manufacturer?

quote:

OK the annoying part is that MS believes people always want to dispose their old PC- there are people who are ready to buy a new PC, new Windows, but they want to keep the old one as well- and have two PCs, and after a while, 3 PCs!
and not everyone wants to hook up all of the PCs in the home to the internet.



MS is well aware of this fact. The problem is the people you speak of represent only about 5% of the market.

quote:

but, and that's the point they do not support, maybe people want two regions, or two different places to see DVDs.



Is that the fault of Windows, or are they bound by law to do this?

Like I said, I'm not trying to start anything here. But if we are going to act as Judges, Jurors, and Executioners, let us make certain we have the right man.

JamesNT

RAID 0 makes my server feel like a race car - fast and dangerous!
Go to Top of Page

Doug G
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

USA
2096 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/22/2008 :  03:50:11 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:

Some new hardware fails to install, or windows can't find a driver for it, and there is no information in the new hardware found dialog that identifies just what device it is that failed.



But is this truly the fault of Windows? Or the hardware manufacturer?

This would be truly a Windows flaw.

======
Doug G
======
Go to Top of Page

JamesNT
Moderator

USA
2526 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/22/2008 :  11:02:41 AM  Show Profile  Click to see JamesNT's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
Doug,

You have my curiosity peeked. Could you please elaborate?

JamesNT

RAID 0 makes my server feel like a race car - fast and dangerous!
Go to Top of Page

cj_berlin
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

Germany
3173 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/23/2008 :  03:47:53 AM  Show Profile  Visit cj_berlin's Homepage  Look at the Skype address for cj_berlin  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Doug G

quote:

Some new hardware fails to install, or windows can't find a driver for it, and there is no information in the new hardware found dialog that identifies just what device it is that failed.



But is this truly the fault of Windows? Or the hardware manufacturer?

This would be truly a Windows flaw.




I am with James here - how would it be a flaw of the OS? As of XP and newer, you can always go to the device mgr. and view the OEM hardware strings of the problem devices which in most cases is enough as a starting point for a manual driver search. In 2k you could achieve the same with the System Information applet. What more would *you* expect?

Evgenij Smirnov
MISSION CRITICAL Business IT Services Ltd.

Revolutionising the PC desktop at a fixed rate (in German only):
PCohnePC.DE
Go to Top of Page

cj_berlin
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

Germany
3173 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/23/2008 :  03:52:38 AM  Show Profile  Visit cj_berlin's Homepage  Look at the Skype address for cj_berlin  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Doug G

Do a large file copy from the gui over the network, only to have it stop after an hour with some "permission denied" on a file and not being able to continue and skip the file. I don't know how many hours windows has stolen from my life because of this cruddy design.



Oh yeah... I've given up on GUI copying of more than a single file years ago because of that. Makes you learn XCOPY switches faster

Evgenij Smirnov
MISSION CRITICAL Business IT Services Ltd.

Revolutionising the PC desktop at a fixed rate (in German only):
PCohnePC.DE
Go to Top of Page

cj_berlin
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

Germany
3173 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/23/2008 :  03:56:44 AM  Show Profile  Visit cj_berlin's Homepage  Look at the Skype address for cj_berlin  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by mitachu


Mine is the fact that an unreadable CD can bring Explorer to its knees. Or browsing Network Neighbourhood and having Explorer crash out because something's not responding in time.



But there at least is a way out... With MacOS up to 9.1 running on those nifty PowerPCs without a powerswitch all you needed to do was insert a diskette, let it mount, throw it out without dismounting (an option presented by the GUI so one would think it's legit), format it on another machine, insert it back into the PowerPC and try once to access the initial volume... All you could do about it then was pull the power cord.

Evgenij Smirnov
MISSION CRITICAL Business IT Services Ltd.

Revolutionising the PC desktop at a fixed rate (in German only):
PCohnePC.DE

Edited by - cj_berlin on 06/23/2008 04:48:40 AM
Go to Top of Page

joe_elway
Honorable But Hopeless Addict

Ireland
6733 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/23/2008 :  05:45:56 AM  Show Profile  Visit joe_elway's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Jake Mueller

the WMI repository getting hosed up for no reason at all.




That one wrecked my head in a job I was in a few years ago. But a consultant that was ding some work for me had a brainwave - MOM detected the fault and fixed it automatically via a script.

Aidan Finn
MCSE, MVP (Virtual Machine: Systems Administration)

IT Blog: http://www.aidanfinn.com
My Photography: http://www.aidanfinnphoto.com/
My Hyper-V Book: Mastering Hyper-V Deployment
Twitter: http://twitter.com/joe_elway
Go to Top of Page

arek73
Moderator

Poland
4610 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/23/2008 :  09:50:32 AM  Show Profile  Visit arek73's Homepage  Click to see arek73's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by JamesNT
I remember when NT 4.0 came out. [i]OMG! Windoze needs a full 64MB of RAM to run...


Glad you mentioned NT 4.0, James. It's minimum requirements were to have at least 12 MB of RAM (for NT 4.0 Workstation anyway). I remember because I had exactly 12 MB of RAM back then (simply could not afford more, even that came with lots of pain). Guess what? Even with 12 MB of RAM the system performed MUCH better than Windows 95, maybe because most of the applications I was using were truly 32-bit, so they took advantage of it. Heck, when I upgraded to 32 MB of RAM it was rock solid. I was doing graphic design at that time as a freelance and I could do everything as I do now, despite the hardware is (supposedly) 1000 times faster than old good 486 was.

I guess my bottom line would be: productivity-wise, do you really see an improvement in modern OS? You would think that the code would be optimized to take advantage of such a fast hardware. You would think that having so much extra computing power all OS-related operations would be performed quietly without you even noticing it. I don't see it at all. Maybe I am getting more impatient with age, but any second the system acts as it is deciding what kind of weird error message to throw at you this time round to leave you stunned again is just aggrevating.

----
Arek
Go to Top of Page

ccahill
Seasoned But Casual Onlooker

USA
89 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/23/2008 :  11:20:26 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Windows Error Messages....

Entire error message

***Error, Windows has stopped responding.......

Chuck Cahill
Go to Top of Page

wkasdo
Administrator

Netherlands
6255 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/23/2008 :  11:32:32 AM  Show Profile  Click to see wkasdo's MSN Messenger address  Reply with Quote
Probably not a windows thing, but what I hate about most apps is that they are not multithreaded and/or not network aware: lots of waiting, freezing, timeouts and whatever. That includes Office in all its forms, although each generation seems to get a little bit better at it.
Go to Top of Page

nike6
Seasoned But Casual Onlooker

Ireland
28 Posts
Status: offline

Posted - 06/23/2008 :  11:36:27 AM  Show Profile  Visit nike6's Homepage  Reply with Quote
OK error messages. somehow Dungeon Siege was not really working very well on my new AMD board. you know there are even registration cards inside the books hidden in buldings.

adding extra secondary hard drive and WIN98- the hardware bootselector makes it an easy task.
but then...DS (Dungeon Siege) stops responding after a random time interval!

anything from immediately, 3 minutes, upto 15 minutes. whatshowever, i played through the whole plot, including the Aranna scenario, using the SAVE function very often. now there are 500 MB game save states!

now the funny stuff. after a while, i figured out sometimes continue is possible without reboot.
hit CRTL ALT DEL.
then the TAB KEY.
press RETURN.
after ten seconds, the sound replay will hang. press RETURN again.
variations of these key input combinations.

sometimes two times CTRL ALT DEL was required.
reboot count: maybe 300 times (within 2 days).
*stopped playing*

now i use WIN98SE on PIII board (new 128MB graphics card).
FRAME RATE is 6 screens per second! (it is absolutely unrelated to WINDOWS)
do you think i like this situation?
OK clearly i need three computers just to play Dungeon Siege.
(two titles on CD, freshly from the shop, do not work on new AMD system. have not tested on the old PIII. they have WIN VISTA sticker...but anyway it is a mainboard issue)
in a few years, WINDOWS will maybe support legacy PCs!

http://www.popfly.com/users/tetsu-jp
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Mark Minasi's Reader Forum © 2002-2009 Mark Minasi Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.55 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000